中国修复重建外科杂志

中国修复重建外科杂志

骨膜在牵拉成骨中的作用研究进展

查看全文

目的 综述骨膜在牵拉成骨过程中作用的研究进展。 方法 广泛查阅近年来国内外有关骨膜在牵拉成骨过程中作用的文献,分析总结骨膜在牵拉成骨中的作用机制及其影响因素。 结果 骨膜富含新骨生成所必需的各种细胞(MSCs、成骨细胞等)、微血管及各种生长因子等,为牵拉成骨过程中新骨的生成提供必要的细胞支持、营养物质支持及代谢调节,能显著促进牵拉成骨过程中新骨的生成。 结论 骨膜在牵拉成骨过程中起着非常重要的作用。

Objective To review the research progress of the role of periosteum in distraction osteogenesis. Methods The related domestic and foreign literature about the role of periosteum in distraction osteogenesis in recent years was extensively reviewed, summarized, and the mechanism and influencing factors of periosteum during traction and osteogenesis were analyzed. Results The periosteum is rich in all kinds of cells (mesenchymal stem cells, osteoblasts, etc.), microvessel and various growth factors, which are necessary for the formation of new bone. It can promote the formation of new bone in the process of traction osteogenesis significantly. Conclusion The periosteum plays an important role in the progress of distraction osteogenesis.

关键词: 骨膜; 牵拉成骨; 研究进展

Key words: Periosteum; distraction osteogenesis; research progress

引用本文: 付繁刚, 张锴. 骨膜在牵拉成骨中的作用研究进展. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2017, 31(7): 876-879. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201701073 复制

登录后 ,请手动点击刷新查看全文内容。 没有账号,
1. Augustin G, Antabak A, Davila S. The periosteum. Part 1: Anatomy, histology and molecular biology. Injury, 2007, 38(10): 1115-1130.
2. Lin Z, Fateh A, Salem DM, et al. Periosteum: biology and applications in craniofacial bone regeneration. J Dent Res, 2014, 93(2): 109-116.
3. Colno C. Skeletal cell fate decisions within periosteum and bone marrow during bone regeneration. J Bone Miner Res, 2009, 24(2): 274-282.
4. Ferretti C, Mattioli-Belmonte M. Periosteum derived stem cells for regenerative medicine proposals: Boosting current knowledge. World J Stem Cells, 2014, 6(3): 266-277.
5. Nakahara K, Haga-Tsujimura M, Iizuka T, et al. Periosteum-Induced Bone Formation by Distraction Osteogenesis: Histologic and Microcomputed Tomography Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2016, 31(4): 785-792.
6. Takushima A, Kitano Y, Harii K. Osteogenic potential of cultured periosteal cells in a distracted bone gap in rabbits. J Surg Res, 1998, 78(1): 68-77.
7. Hoffman MD, Benoit DS. Emulating native periosteum cell population and subsequent paracrine factor production to promote tissue engineered periosteum-mediated allograft healing. Biomaterials, 2015, 52: 426-440.
8. Yiannakopoulos CK, Kanellopoulos AD, Trovas GP, et al. The biomechanical capacity of the periosteum in intact long bones. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2008, 128(1): 117-120.
9. 拓振合, 赵琳, 王栓科, 等. 组织工程骨膜及脱蛋白骨辅助支架修复兔桡骨大段骨缺损. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2014, 28(4): 511-516.
10. Chang H, Knothe Tate ML. Concise review: the periosteum: tapping into a reservoir of clinically useful progenitor cells. Stem Cells Transl Med, 2012, 1(6): 480-491.
11. Hoffman MD, Xie C, Zhang X, et al. The effect of mesenchymal stem cells delivered via hydrogel-based tissue engineered periosteum on bone allograft healing. Biomaterials, 2013, 34(35): 8887-8898.
12. Colnot C, Zhang X, Knothe Tate ML, et al. Current insights on the regenerative potential of the periosteum: molecular, cellular, and endogenous engineering approaches. J Orthop Res, 2012, 30(12): 1869-1878.
13. Fujio M, Yamamoto A, Ando Y, et al. Stromal cell-derived factor-1 enhances distraction osteogenesis-mediated skeletal ltissue regeneration through the recruitment of endothelial precursors. Bone, 2011, 49(4): 693-700.
14. Zhang WB, Zheng LW, Chua DT, et al. Expression of bone morphogenetic protein, vascular endothelial growth factor, and basic fibroblast growth factor in irradiated mandibles during distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 69(11): 2860-2871.
15. van Gastel N, Torrekens S, Roberts SJ, et al. Engineering vascularized bone: osteogenic and proangiogenic potential of murine periosteal cells. Stem Cells, 2012, 30(11): 2460-2471.
16. Choi IH, Chung CY, Cho TJ, et al. Angiogenesis and mineralization during distraction osteogenesis. J Korean Med Sci, 2002, 17(4): 435-447.
17. Casap N, Venezia NB, Wilensky A, et al. VEGF facilitates periosteal distraction-induced osteogenesis in rabbits: a micro-computerized tomography study. Tissue Eng Part A, 2008, 14(2): 247-253.
18. Hoffman MD, Benoit DS. Emerging ideas: Engineering the periosteum: revitalizing allografts by mimicking autograft healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013, 471(3): 721-726.
19. Schmidt BL, Kung L, Jones C, et al. Induced osteogenesis by periosteal distraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2002, 60(10): 1170-1175.
20. 刘亚, 宋庆高, 尹鑫海, 等. 下颌骨骨膜牵张成骨的实验研究. 遵义医学院学报, 2008, 31(2): 30-32.
21. 任志勇, 李涛, 张维彬, 等. 兔胫骨干骺端骨膜外截骨对延长区成骨作用的影响. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2015, 23(2): 150-155.
22. 黎润光, 邵景范, 魏明发. 机械牵张应力对成骨细胞的影响研究进展. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2006, 14(6): 457-460.
23. Weyts FA, Bosmans B, Niesing R, et al. Mechanical control of human osteoblast apoptosis and proliferation in relation to differentiation. Calcif Tissue Int, 2003, 72(4): 505-512.
24. Winter LC, Walboomers XF, Bumgardner JD, et al. Intermittent versus continuous stretching effects on osteoblast-like cells in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2003, 67(4): 1269-1275.
25. 孙溪饶. 牵引速率及频率对牵张成骨的影响. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2010, 14(41): 7727-7730.
26. Choi IH, Shim JS, Seong SC, et al. Effect of the distraction rate on the activity of the osteoblast lineage in distraction osteogenesis of rat’s tibia. Immunostaining study of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen, osteocalcin, and transglutaminase C. Bull Hosp Jt Dis, 1997, 56(1): 34-40.
27. Moore DC, Leblanc CW, Müller R, et al. Physiologic weight-bearing increases new vessel formation during distraction osteogenesis: a micro-tomographic imaging study. J Orthop Res, 2003, 21(3): 489-496.
28. Kesemenli CC, Subasi M, Kaya H, et al. The effects of electromagnetic field on distraction osteogenesis. Yonsei Med J, 2003, 44(3): 385-391.
29. 詹玉林, 侯国柱, 安智全, 等. 兔骨缺损模型中骨膜对骨形态发生蛋白-2 分泌量及骨愈合影响的实验研究. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2013, 15(10): 884-888.
30. Issa JP, Nascimento C, Lamano T, et al. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on bone formation in the acute distraction osteogenesis of rat mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(11): 1286-1292.